[ad_1]
President Eisenhower warned about the dangers of the military-industrial complex in 1961, which includes the close ties between the military, defense contractors, government, and policy decisions. The complex has great influence on American society, with some believing it is excessive and contrary to the public good. The link between the military and industry is ancient, with some suspecting that companies develop defense equipment to promote conflict. The government plays a crucial role in the complex, with some members of the legislature accused of catering to defense interests. Concerns about the complex were rife during the Vietnam War, and while public awareness has declined, the inherent problems associated with it remain.
The “military-industrial complex,” or MIC, is a term many Americans became familiar with in a speech President Eisenhower delivered in 1961 as he left office. In the speech, Eisenhower warned citizens that the close ties between the military and the companies that supply them could be dangerous to society. He strongly felt that the increase in US military spending in the 1950s was not good for the country as a whole and that it was triggered by the military-industrial complex, which promoted it.
Eisenhower effectively omitted a third leg of the so-called “iron triangle”. The military-industrial complex is not just the link between the military and defense contractors. It also includes government, in the form of a Congress that votes on spending bills, and an executive branch that pushes policy decisions. The power of the military-industrial complex is considerable, and the Iron Triangle has great influence on American society. Many people believe that the influence of the military-industrial complex is excessive and may be contrary to the public good.
The link between the military and industry is ancient. Warfare has always led to technological advances, as nations develop new ways of waging war against each other. Some people suspect that the formula goes the other way too, with companies developing defense equipment that promotes conflict, so that their wares have a market. Companies that manufacture products for the military rely on a large military to request their equipment, and the military relies on those companies to reliably deliver goods and services.
The government plays a crucial role in the military-industrial complex. For example, some members of the legislature have historically been accused of catering to defense interests, helping companies win big contracts, turning a blind eye to regulatory violations, and promoting policies that ensure defense contractors will continue to find work. This is a clear conflict between the interests of private industry, national security and political policy.
Concern about the military-industrial complex was rife during the Vietnam War, in which large amounts of American money and lives were spent. Some critics believed that the war was being fueled by the military-industrial complex, which clearly had a financial interest in continued hostilities. Concerns about the Iron Triangle faded in the 1980s, with a much smaller fringe of society expressing doubts about how government spending was being allocated. The inherent problems associated with the military-industrial complex have not gone away, even as public awareness has declined.
[ad_2]