[ad_1]
The term “socialized medicine” is difficult to define and can be perceived differently. In the US, efforts to create a government-involved healthcare system date back to President Theodore Roosevelt. Some view socialized medicine as the government paying for healthcare in exchange for higher taxation, as seen in Canada and the UK. However, the term is considered pejorative and glosses over existing government healthcare programs. Supporters of government healthcare may use different terms such as public health or universal health. Political orientation plays a significant role in defining the system.
Socialized medicine is a somewhat elusive term to define as people can perceive it in different ways. This is especially true in the United States, where efforts to create some form of large-scale government-involved health care system have been underway for a long time. The push for this system didn’t just begin in the 1990s, when then-First Lady Hillary Clinton worked on crafting a plan. Instead it dates back to President Theodore Roosevelt, who suggested public health insurance in the early 20th century.
By socialized medicine, some people mean that the government would pay for healthcare, often in exchange for higher taxation. People would not pay for most government-funded health services. Such systems exist in places like Canada and the UK. There are options in both countries to carry other private insurance and in Canada, most citizens pay extra for prescription drug coverage. However, most costs for doctor visits or surgery are fully covered.
The term “socialized” as it is currently used can be considered pejorative, especially to anyone who opposes US government involvement in health care. It is used in place of socialism and can be used to create fear or concern that the government exercises too much control over people as it is and that allowing the government to “control” health care would lead the country in a socialist direction. When used in a negative sense, it tends to gloss over the fact that the US government has several “socialized medicine” programs. These include the Medicaid system and the State Children’s Health Information Program (SCHIP). To some extent, the health programs covering the US military and Medicare are also socialized.
Those in favor of creating a government health system, even if they retain many private options, do not necessarily call the proposed systems socialized medicine. They may refer to them as public health, universal health, single payer, or public option. The idea of socialism, especially as an evocation of fear of the Cold War or sometimes of communist states, is hardly credible. Indeed, some opponents of the term suggest that “socialized” should become the adjective in the face of many taxpayer-based systems of government, and note that few people refer to road systems as socialized streets or post offices as socialized mail.
What this really means when trying to define the system from a US perspective is that the definition can depend a lot on political orientation. It should be noted that there is a change in this, as it was a Republican president who first proposed national health care. Today, it would be fair to say that most on the right are more opposed to what they consider socialized medicine, while most on the left support some form of government healthcare.
[ad_2]