[ad_1]
Dynamic psychiatry emphasizes the importance of the therapeutic relationship and subjective experiences in treating mental illness. It re-evaluates subconscious conflicts and incorporates the theories of psychiatrists like Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud. The current psychiatric model is criticized for its outdated and ineffective approach, and the influence of environmental factors on mental illness is emphasized.
Dynamic psychiatry is a growing branch of psychiatric science that seeks to combat the devaluation of the therapeutic relationship, which is often considered the most valuable resource in the treatment of mental illness. According to proponents of the dynamic psychiatric approach, such as the Institute for Dynamic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, for example, well-meaning mental health professionals feel powerless as their patients have to settle for substandard treatment that leads to minimal improvement. Practitioners and patients are often forced to minimize or revise treatment due to restriction by managed care company protocols, often leading to depressing mental health rehabilitation rates. The basis of the reformed and dynamic approach to psychiatry places much more importance on the patient’s relationships with the significant people in her life and also on subjective feelings, thoughts and emotions. This approach stands in stark contrast to the largely objective diagnosis of mental illness and subsequent “one size fits all” approach to treatment seen in many clinical mental health settings.
The theory and implementation of dynamic psychiatry attempts to reinvent the relationship between the patient and the clinician. Subconscious information and the conflicts arising from its expression are re-evaluated as valid psychiatric models. The work of well-known psychiatrists such as Carl Jung and Sigmund Freud has been examined in a more modern light so that their theories can be instituted in routine psychiatric treatment.
Nobel Prize-winning scientist Eric Kandel contributed to the movement with his research on how social cues in the environment affect the neurotransmitter serotonin, which essentially highlights the fallacy of the orthodox model which holds that most psychiatric illnesses are due to chemical imbalances intrinsics of uncertain origin. In light of accumulating evidence that the current psychiatric model is outdated and ineffective, dynamic psychiatry professionals diagnose and treat patients after a thorough analysis of the unconscious conflict and the deficits and distortions that may be present in the patient’s life.
The perceived shortcomings of the current psychiatry system are lamented by the eminent psychiatrist Kenneth Kendler. He explains that part of the collapse of the orthodox system lies in the almost unquestioned belief that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally separate entities. Kendler argues that although both psychiatric illness and mental processes are biological, the range and complexity of illness cannot be explained simply in terms of biology; the influence of circumstances such as significant life events and even environmental factors that modify gene expression must be considered. Kendler’s hypothesis reflects the fact that changes and abnormalities in brain chemistry can indeed affect the mind, but the mind’s only marginally tangible processes, such as emotions and repressed feelings, can affect the brain in the same way.
[ad_2]