[ad_1]
President Roosevelt’s First 100 Days Agenda, established in response to the Great Depression, set a high standard for subsequent presidents. The first 100 days are seen as a litmus test for presidential success, but it can take longer to implement effective plans. Roosevelt’s actions continue to create high expectations for incoming presidents, but history shows that success in the first 100 days does not always guarantee success throughout a presidency.
When President Franklin D. Roosevelt took office in 1933, the United States was reeling from the hardships of the Great Depression. Many people were out of work with little help, banks were threatening to fail completely, and many people felt aggressive reforms were needed to help reshape the country. Those who supported President Roosevelt and elected him also expected rapid reform. In response, Roosevelt established an agenda of the first 100 days that has been considered one of the most ambitious in the history of the American presidency.
President Roosevelt’s First 100 Days Agenda attacked the problems facing the United States from several directions, and in those days, he signed numerous plans and created many programs designed to lift the United States and its people out of the crisis. The effectiveness of these plans can be debated, but one thing is certain. By embarking on such an ambitious path, Roosevelt created a sort of litmus test by which all other presidents would be judged. It is now very common for politicians and political analysts to look at the first 100 days as a kind of indication of the direction of any person’s role in the presidency.
When Roosevelt put his plans into action, for example, he was virtually unopposed by Congress. This has not been the case for many of the subsequent presidents. Depending on the political leaning of the House or Senate, presidents can face great opposition as they try to pass ambitious bills when they reach office. The first 100 days can spark a power struggle between the executive and legislative branches that will continue throughout a presidency and render a president’s plans ineffective.
Another reason many people accept the first 100 day analysis as a sign of a president’s effectiveness is because this is when presidents can begin to deliver on campaign promises or prove they have exaggerated or lied about their claims. their intentions. An informed electorate can pay close attention to early decisions made to see if they adhere to the promises a president made before he was elected. Public opinion of the presidency can rise or fall depending on how these early days of governing the country are used.
There have been successful presidents and those who are judged kindly enough or are elected to a second term who don’t have great “first 100 days.” President Ronald Reagan was nearly assassinated in the early days of his presidency. Perhaps most often cited is President John F. Kennedy’s involvement in the Bay of Pigs, which scared most Americans, as many thought nuclear war was imminent. This occurred on the 88th day of Kennedy’s term. Other examples abound.
Many people argue that the first 100 days are an accurate litmus test for presidential success. Especially when a president takes over at a time of great stress in the country, it can certainly take more than 100 days to implement plans that will benefit the United States or its citizens. Some political analysts and politicians actually plead with new presidents not to be “jumped” by the 100-day myth and argue that creating good programs or laws is much more in the people’s interest than simply creating quick programs or laws that later they will prove to have problems or have not been carefully constructed.
However, President Roosevelt’s actions continue to lead to the expectation of many that any incoming president will show his qualities in his first 100 days in office. History does not always support this expectation. However, a country ready for change may be impatient and want to see it quickly, and presidents who respond to this expediently may keep the people in favor longer.
