[ad_1]
A majority shareholder owns over 50% of a company’s shares and wields substantial power, but must exercise caution to avoid disadvantaging minority shareholders. Laws protect minority shareholders and the majority shareholder must not manipulate their authority for personal gain. Voting rights may also negate some of the power of the majority shareholder.
Shareholders are people who have purchased interests in a company which makes them part owners of the company. The majority shareholder is the individual who owns the majority of the shares of a company. This means that he generally has more power than all the other shareholders combined. Such situations tend to be more common with private companies than with public companies.
Being a shareholder requires that a person own at least a full interest in a corporation. If this is the case, the shareholder is generally granted certain rights with respect to the company in which he invested. For example, such a person may have the right to attend annual meetings, introduce resolutions, and vote on matters related to operations.
To be a majority shareholder, a person generally must own more than 50 percent of a company’s shares. When this is the case, the individual typically wields a substantial amount of power over the corporation. He likely has the ability to do things that other shareholders do not have the authority to do, such as replace officers or the board of directors of a corporation.
Being a majority shareholder may seem like a situation characterized only by advantages, but there are many reasons why this individual needs to exercise caution. Investing in a company that has a majority shareholder can put minority shareholders at an extreme disadvantage. For this reason, the law often seeks to protect these individuals by imposing certain obligations on the person who owns the majority. These will vary by location and type of corporation, but in any case, there may be consequences for failing to meet these obligations.
For example, the majority shareholder is not supposed to manipulate his authority for unfair personal gain. This is true even if she is the founder of the company. Due to the rules in her jurisdiction, she may be responsible for ensuring the proper disclosure of certain information and may be required to provide fiduciary duties. Otherwise, minority shareholders can file lawsuits against it.
In some cases, voting rights may negate some of the power of the majority shareholder. Some companies have votes that have different weights. This means that one person may own a majority of the shares in a company, but he or she may not have much authority. It should also be noted that controlling shareholders do not have to be individuals. It is common to find that a company owns a majority of the shares in another business.
Smart Asset.
[ad_2]