[ad_1]
CRT monitors were once the only option for desktops, but LCDs have become the standard due to improvements in technology and affordability. While CRTs have advantages such as clarity and reliability, they are heavy, emit radiation, and are not environmentally friendly. LCDs have better graphics, are easier on the eyes, and emit less radiation. LCDs have overtaken CRTs, except for graphics professionals or in areas with limited digital displays. When purchasing an LCD, it’s important to read reviews as specifications can vary between manufacturers.
In the past, CRT monitors were the only choice for desktop systems, while LCDs were built into laptops. In the late 1990s, people had a choice between the two. As technology has improved, it has become more difficult to buy new CRTs, while flat screens have become the standard. Although LCDs were once quite expensive, the prices have come down considerably. However, CRTs still have advantages, including clarity and reliability.
The traditional CRT monitor looks like a television and uses the same technology. They have many advantages: they are cheap, reliable, have good clear images and can be viewed from any angle. Unfortunately, they are also heavy, have a large footprint, are not environmentally friendly, and emit a fair amount of low-frequency radiation thought to be unhealthy.
LCDs or flat panel displays weigh less than 10 pounds (
As technology has improved, however, LCDs have improved in all areas with sales surpassing CRTs in 2003. Even with these improvements, it is still argued that CRTs remain more suited to graphics professionals and those demanding color uniform regardless of viewing angle. Video editors, game developers, or anyone who works with fast-moving images in a professional capacity might also prefer a CRT, although it seems safe to assume that diehard devotees have dwindled over the years. The remaining attraction for older technology is cost, attractive to those on a tight budget or those who use their computers only infrequently, as a used CRT can be picked up for next to nothing. However, the price of new LCDs has dropped dramatically in recent years.
However, the feud between the two is over for the most part. LCD monitors have stunning colors and graphics with much sharper text and a screen that’s easier on the eyes, reducing the strain and headaches that sometimes accompanied long hours on a CRT. They’re also great for long hours in text-based applications like word processors or spreadsheets, and don’t require radiation shields.
Choosing a model with a wide viewing angle effectively eliminates “wash out”, while faster response rates eliminated ghosting. With reduced eye strain, great color and virtually no fading or ghosting, a good LCD is a great choice for the whole family. Whether it’s playing games, creating a family photo album, browsing, doing homework or writing job offers, the LCD will take up less space, use less electricity and emit less radiation.
Due to its many advantages, LCDs have basically overtaken CRT technology. Aside from graphics professionals, choosing between an LCD or a CRT today may be better in countries or regions where digital displays are scarce and application requires the least expensive option, such as in rural schools or non-profit organizations and humanitarian aid in third world nations. In these cases, the diligent CRT will serve well and can be purchased inexpensively.
People interested in purchasing an LCD monitor should note that there is a lack of standardization of specifications. A viewing angle may actually be wider than advertised or narrower. Response rates can also vary from manufacturer to manufacturer, so a direct comparison of different models can be misleading judging by specifications alone. Buyers may find it helpful to read reviews from people who already own the product, along with professional reviews.
