Two types of flat tax systems proposed for the US: flat sales tax and flat income tax. Benefits of flat sales tax include consistency and ease of management, but some areas may lose revenue. Flat income tax promotes fairness, but some households may pay more and tax deductions would not be allowed. Experts predict economic growth.
Two types of theoretical flat tax systems have been proposed for the United States. The first is a flat sales tax on everyday items, which contrasts with 2011 sales tax rates that vary by county and state. The second is a flat income tax under which everyone eligible to pay taxes will be charged the same rate, regardless of their job. This is in contrast to the 2011 income tax method in the United States, which uses things like expenses and income level, among others, to determine how much a user pays in taxes each year.
The silver lining to a flat sales tax would be that consumers would spend the same amount of money on sales tax regardless of where they shop. Sales taxes can fluctuate wildly, depending on what area of the country a person is shopping in, and a flat rate would make purchases easier to manage and, in some places, possibly cheaper. One possible negative effect of a flat sales tax is that some counties or states could lose money if the flat tax rate is set below their current sales tax rate. Many state and local governments rely on sales tax revenue for revenue, so this could result in loss of funding for these areas.
A positive aspect of a flat income tax would be a sense of fairness for all consumers. If everyone was taxed at the same flat tax rate, regardless of how much a person earns each year, there would no longer be a penalty for being successful. One drawback is that, with the 2011 United States tax system, some households are exempt from tax for a variety of reasons. With a flat tax system, these households would end up spending more money in taxes than they would in the traditional system.
Another possible disadvantage of a flat income tax is that tax deductions would not be allowed. This could reduce the amount of charitable contributions made by people who, under the traditional tax structure, make charitable contributions to add to the amount of money they can deduct from their income at the end of the tax year. This could also have a negative effect on the US housing market, as many taxpayers receive deductions as incentives to buy new homes throughout the year. On the contrary, experts predict that a single tax would stimulate economic growth, which could offset negative effects in areas such as the housing market.
Smart Asset.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
