When accused of a crime, a person can plead not guilty, guilty, or no contest. Pleading guilty requires an admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment, while no contest acknowledges the possibility of conviction but does not admit guilt. A guilty plea must be accepted by the court and evidence presented. A no contest plea cannot be used against a defendant in a subsequent civil trial. Both pleas have their purposes and can work differently for individuals facing criminal and civil charges.
When someone is accused of a crime, they can respond in one of three ways: they can plead not guilty, guilty, or nolo contendere, which literally means “no dispute.” Pleading not guilty is pretty self-explanatory: it’s actually the person saying, “I didn’t, and I want my day in court.” A guilty plea requires an admission that the defendant committed the crime. In a no contest, however, he does not admit guilt, but accepts the punishment.
When someone pleads guilty, they admit they committed the crime and accept the punishment for it. A guilty plea, however, is not automatically accepted by the court. The judge must be convinced that the person is actually guilty, as opposed to, for example, covering up for a loved one. The prosecution must present some of the evidence that he expected to use in court to prove the elements of his case.
The person offering the guilty plea normally has to allocate, or describe in his own words, the crime that has been committed. The judge must also engage the defendant in an interview, or discussion, to ensure that the person understands the meaning of the plea, especially regarding the waiver of the right to a jury trial. A person cannot plead guilty – and a court cannot accept a guilty plea – if the defendant actively pleads innocence.
A no contest appeal effectively says: “I’m not saying I committed the crime, but I acknowledge that I could be convicted anyway, so I will take the punishment.” A person entering a no contest plea can still claim innocence, or at least refrain from claiming guilt. The defendant who makes no claim may find that the costs of a trial – financial, emotional, or time-related – are greater than the costs of the plea. Especially if the punishment is relatively minor, such as a fine or community service, a defendant may file a no-contest plea rather than risk conviction, and possibly a more severe penalty, in a trial.
One advantage of a no contest plea is that it cannot be used against a defendant in a subsequent civil trial. For example, let’s say someone is accused of reckless driving and causes a personal injury accident. The penalties may not be too harsh, but the injured person could eventually file a civil suit asking for large pecuniary damages. If the defendant pleads guilty in the criminal case, the injured person could use that plea in the civil case as evidence that the driver has already admitted responsibility for the accident. With a no contest plea, however, the defendant can maintain their innocence, while still avoiding the time and expense of a criminal trial.
The differences between a guilty plea and a no-contest plea can be subtle. Both grounds have their purposes and can work differently for individuals facing criminal and civil charges.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
