Medical malpractice costs are often blamed for rising healthcare expenditures, but research shows that the burden is mostly borne by patients in the form of lost wages and increased medical bills. While malpractice insurance premiums have increased in the US, UK, and Canada, economists disagree on whether these costs affect national healthcare spending. Malpractice costs account for less than 2% of national healthcare spending in the US and less than 0.5% in other countries. Proponents of spending reductions argue that high malpractice rates can limit access to healthcare services.
A growing segment of the population points to rising medical malpractice costs as factors in rising national health care expenditures. This is especially true in the United States, where medical liability insurance continues to increase. Many people suspect that these costs drive up individual insurance premiums and raise rates for medical services. Research indicates, however, that the true burden of medical malpractice costs is borne directly by victimized patients in the form of lost wages and increased medical bills. Economists in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada and Australia generally disagree on whether the costs of neglect affect national health care spending.
As medical malpractice insurance costs have risen steadily over the past 10 years, many are wondering how this affects overall health care costs. In the United States, for example, medical liability insurance premiums for all physicians nationwide increased by an average of 15% between 2000 and 2002, with the largest increases for specialists in fields such as obstetrics and gynecology and general surgery. . These rates have also increased in the UK and Canada. Many economists are therefore wondering how to implement financial liability coverage for medical service providers without impacting additional healthcare costs.
Medical malpractice is generally the professional failure of doctors or hospitals to provide adequate care to a patient. Also known as medical malpractice, this failure can lead to serious injury, illness or even death. Many countries around the world, including the UK, Ireland and the Philippines have established laws addressing and managing medical malpractice. As a result, doctors are often legally required to maintain medical liability insurance to pay for any legal costs.
Many citizens today say that rising health care costs are in part the result of large medical malpractice costs. Some speculate that insurance companies shift the burden of costly malpractice lawsuit payments onto policyholders in the form of individual premiums, while others theorize that physicians charge higher fees for services to offset insurance costs. A growing number of people therefore argue that imposing limits on litigation premiums would lower medical malpractice costs and ease overall health care costs.
In the United States, however, health care experts estimate that malpractice costs account for less than two percent of national health care spending. Significant reductions in these costs can therefore have only a modest impact on the growth of overall expenditure. Concerns have also been raised about the practice of defensive medicine, which is a collection of techniques aimed at avoiding malpractice lawsuits. Examples may include tests, procedures, or office visits that do not necessarily benefit the patient, but rather reduce the physician’s exposure to malpractice liability. The conflicting results of the analyses, however, cannot determine the true cost of such procedures.
Proponents of health care spending reductions often cite the potential impact of malpractice premium spending on the access and availability of health care services. To illustrate, doctors may be less inclined to practice in an area where rates are substantially high, thus closing clinics and forcing residents to seek treatment elsewhere. It is believed that without competition from multiple providers, healthcare costs can increase exponentially in facilities where services are available. While such events may be true in some regions, research into this cause and effect is limited and does not provide an accurate conclusion.
One way medical malpractice costs drive expenses is the burden they place on patients and their families. These costs are believed to be largely borne by hospitals and doctors who pay large sums of money to patients involved in lawsuits. In reality, however, the costs are reflected in additional medical bills, time lost from work, and pain and suffering experienced by patients each year. Research also shows that most of these patients do not sue doctors, thus denying the potential for legal proceedings.
Data analyzed in the United States, Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom in 2001 showed that US citizens file more malpractice claims than citizens of other countries, but the distribution of compensation is approximately the same. In all four countries, medical malpractice costs accounted for less than 0.5 percent of health care spending that year. Many economists therefore conclude that medical malpractice costs do not drive national health care expenditures. In the United States, healthcare spending is believed to be much greater than in other nations simply due to higher physician incomes and rising medical care prices.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
