Irreparable harm?

[ad_1]

Irreparable damage refers to damage that cannot be repaired with money. It is a legal term used in court to justify granting a preliminary or permanent injunction. Injunctions are equitable remedies which prevent a person from taking a particular action because the action would be so harmful that the injured party could not be compensated.
People within most legal systems have a duty to each other not to cause harm either negligently or intentionally. Most commonly, when that duty is breached, the party injured by the breach sues the other individual in a civil action. If the suing plaintiff can prove that he has suffered damage as a result of the defendant’s default, the defendant is ordered to pay monetary restitution to compensate the plaintiff.

The monetary awards awarded in most civil cases are usually sufficient to repair the damage. For example, if a plaintiff sues a defendant for damaging his lawn mower, the defendant may be ordered to pay for the lawn mower to be repaired or for a new lawn mower. The plaintiff can then buy a new lawn mower and is in the same position he was in before the damage occurred.

There are some situations, however, where monetary awards would not be sufficient to heal a plaintiff. In these situations, the plaintiff will seek a temporary or permanent injunction to stop the defendant from doing whatever it is he or she was trying to do. The court will grant the injunction only if the plaintiff demonstrates that irreparable harm would result from the actions.

There are many examples of situations where an injunction may be appropriate based on irreparable harm. For example, if a plaintiff has a large old tree on his property and the defendant threatens to cut down the tree, the plaintiff can seek a court order to stop the defendant from cutting down the tree. The plaintiff can show irreparable harm because the defendant cannot simply purchase another 100-year-old tree to plant, and as such the monetary compensation would not be sufficient to compensate the plaintiff for the damage suffered.

If a defendant threatens to release the secret formula for a popular product, like Coke, the judge will likely also grant an injunction to stop him. The release of the formula would be considered irreparable damage because the loss from the release of the formula could never be accurately calculated nor paid for by a single person. Instead, an injunction would be the best way to rectify the situation and protect the plaintiff’s legal interests.

[ad_2]