[ad_1]
Partner compensation can be determined by employee performance, seniority, subjective merit, role in the company, and company size. The goal is to ensure high employee retention. Pay for performance can lead to fragmentation, seniority may not adequately award top performers, and subjective merit is complex. Compensation can play a role in a company’s strategic direction and retention of key employees.
There are several different ways a company can determine partner compensation. Some of the most common ones include employee performance, seniority, and subjective merit. Company size and strategic positioning can also affect how partners are compensated. The overall goal for most companies is to determine what type of partner compensation will ensure the highest level of employee retention.
One of the most direct types of partner compensation is pay for performance. With this system, the employee is compensated directly for the profits made with his customers. While this type of compensation can help motivate individual employees, it can also lead to company fragmentation, as employees tend to see the customers they work with as their own rather than as part of the company’s customer base.
Seniority is another simple form of partner compensation. It involves deciding on a certain percentage of each partner’s profits, based on how long they’ve been with the company. While this type of compensation may be easy to calculate, it may not adequately award top performers. It can also cause discord if more highly compensated partners don’t seem to be carrying their weight.
Subjective merit is one of the most complex types of partner compensation. With this method, objective factors are used to support a subjective analysis of partner performance. This is usually determined by a small group of partners. Compensation is based on the quality of work that the employee considers done based on this analysis. While company policy can complicate this system, it is often an effective way to encourage stronger performance.
Compensation can also be determined by the role the partner plays in the company. Partners with management roles may receive more compensation. Compensation is also often different for partners who are approaching retirement age and taking a smaller role in company affairs. The performance of part-time partners can also be analyzed differently from full-time employees.
Partner compensation can play an important role in a company’s strategic direction. By effectively splitting profits among partners, a company can improve its retention of key employees. This helps give the company a competitive advantage. A key factor in achieving this is ensuring that there is no major dissatisfaction among partners regarding the pay structure.
Asset Smart.
[ad_2]