Single-payer healthcare and universal healthcare are often confused, but they have distinct differences. Single-payer healthcare is a system managed by a central fund, while universal healthcare is coverage for everyone, which can be achieved through a variety of sources. The difference is important to understand in healthcare discussions and when reviewing proposed health plans.
Terms like “single-payer healthcare” and “universal healthcare” are often thrown around, especially in an election year. Some people are under the impression that these terms are synonymous, but there is a distinct difference between single-payer healthcare and universal healthcare that is very important to understand. While both systems are typically aimed at making health coverage more affordable for people, they work in slightly different ways.
Single-payer healthcare is a healthcare system managed by a central fund. A classic example is the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK. The NHS is administered by the British government and was founded in the wake of the Second World War. Under this system, when patients receive medical care, the government pays for it, using funds raised through taxes and other means. Some people refer to single-payer healthcare as socialized medicine, in reference to the fact that it is typically administered by a government.
Universal health care is health coverage for everyone. In some cases, a health care system is both single payer and universal; the NHS, for example, covers all British citizens. In other cases, a universal healthcare system uses a variety of sources to provide coverage, combining government funds, private insurance companies, and so on to make sure no citizen passes through the gaps. This is a key difference between the two types of healthcare systems, with some people arguing that using a variety of funding sources is not efficient.
It is also possible that a healthcare system is single payer, but not universal. The American Medicare system, which covers the elderly, is an example of this type of single payment system. In this case, when older adults get treatment, the government pays for it with Medicare funds. In order to be included in this single payment scheme, seniors must also meet several criteria.
Understanding the difference between single-payer healthcare and universal healthcare can enable people to be more informed in health care discussions. Especially in the United States, the difference between the two has been a major sticking point in many political campaigns, with people suggesting various blends of these systems to meet the healthcare needs of the American people.
Most first world countries have a universal healthcare system to ensure that all of their citizens are covered. Some of these systems are also single-payer systems, with many health reformers seeking universal single-payer systems as a model, arguing that they are the most efficient and cost-effective. When reviewing a proposed health plan for a particular region of the world, people may want to keep in mind the difference between single payer systems and universal systems.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN