[ad_1]
Situational ethics is a religion-based theory that allows for ethical responses to be qualified in order to prioritize the Christian New Testament injunction to love all people. It aims to move away from legalistic and antinomian approaches, recognizing fundamental laws that provide a framework for making value judgments. It represents a middle ground between legalistic and antinomian expressions of ethics and has had an impact on many Christian denominations.
Also known as situation ethics, situation ethics is a religion-based theory relating to the application of ethical principles to various situations. Originally conceived by Joseph Fletcher in the 1960s, the approach sought to qualify ethical responses in such a way as to allow the Christian New Testament injunction to love all people to supersede any other moral imperative when an apparent contradiction was present . Fletcher, an Episcopal priest, defined love in terms of the Greek word “agape” and used the literal translations of unconditional, absolute, and universal as the basis for the kind of love that should be applied to all aspects of human interaction.
The Christian ethical theory formulated and promoted by Fletcher aimed to move away from the legalistic and antinomian approaches found in many different Christian traditions. Situational ethics went beyond the bounds of legalistic applications of commandments and laws found within the historical Christian canon, observing that while there was a great deal of good within the laws, they could not necessarily address every possible variation of a chain of events. For example, while the Christian canon contains many injunctions that censure the killing of another human being, situational ethics might apply when the killing occurs in self-defense or to prevent harm to loved ones.
Situational ethics also differs from an antinomic approach to ethics. With antinomian ethics, there is little or no recognition of pre-existing laws that serve as a basis for making ethical decisions. Instead, each situation must be considered independently of any application of ethics that has occurred to similar situations in the past. Situational ethics, in contrast, recognizes the existence of fundamental laws that provide a framework for making value judgments about the course of action, tempered by the Golden Rule of Christianity.
To some extent, it can be argued that situational ethics represents a middle ground between the extremes of legalistic and antinomian expressions of ethics. Unlike the legalistic application of moral codes, situational ethics allows for the possibility that a particular situation requires a response that is not well defined by existing laws or commandments. At the same time, it provides more cohesion and structure to the process of defining and developing a code of ethics, as there are commandments and laws that help form a basis for determining the best response to a given situation.
The concept of situational ethics has had an impact in many Christian denominations, as the approach makes it necessary not to rely on tradition or the literal words of the canon of Scripture to provide an accurate answer to modern life. Rather, it motivates individuals to understand laws and commandments in the context and historical context from which they emerged, and determines the extent to which they can be aligned with Jesus’ commandment to love all people.
[ad_2]