[ad_1]
The sociology of science analyzes the social aspects of science, including the effect of scientific discoveries on society, objectivity in research, and research funding. It also examines the history of social change within the scientific community and the interaction of scientists with society. The field provides objective commentary on social behaviors that constitute the best practices of science, including communism and universalism. It also focuses on cases where small groups within the scientific community do not follow normal social behaviors and the relationship between scientists and their work.
The sociology of science is a branch of the social sciences that seeks to examine and analyze the social aspects of science both within the scientific community and within society as a whole. It is a large and multifaceted field that draws from many related fields in the social sciences, mathematics, philosophy, and other areas of study. The sociology of science focuses on a broad range of issues such as the effect of scientific discoveries on society, objectivity in scientific research, and the role of research funding. Many sociologists of science are also interested in the history of social change within the scientific community.
This branch of the social sciences is an important field, as it allows scholars who are not rooted in the scientific community to provide objective commentary on the social aspects of science. In doing so, sociologists of science have been able to provide many classifications of social behaviors that constitute the best practices of science. Communism, for example, should be a hallmark of the scientific community, in the sense that scientific discoveries should belong to the whole community, not just to those who made them. Another trait called universalism describes the idea that anyone of any race or gender should be able to contribute to science and be judged on the basis of ideas and not personal qualities.
In many cases, small groups within the overall scientific community do not follow the normal social behaviors that enable scientists around the world to universally pursue the goal of advancing human knowledge. The sociology of science is particularly focused on these cases, as they tend to create very interesting dynamics between subgroups of science. Some scientific achievements, for example, are kept secret because they are used in the development of military technology. Others are kept secret because they are important to the development of drugs or other profitable products.
The interaction of scientists and the scientific community with the rest of society is another important area of interest in the sociology of science. An interesting dynamic arises from the fact that, in many cases, scientific funding is often determined by those with only limited scientific knowledge. As such, the prestige of the scientist and his ability to demonstrate that his laboratory work is important and valid also in the real world is very important.
Another interesting area of study in the sociology of science is the relationship between scientists and their work. In some cases, scientists become so fond of their work that their research becomes biased. They may inadvertently interpret their results falsely, but in a way that supports their personal theories. Bias can also arise when the scientist relies on positive results to get further funding. This relationship between scientists and those who fund their work is another common area of study in the sociology of science.
[ad_2]