[ad_1]
Subprime loans have interest rates higher than prime rates due to the borrower’s low credit rating. Financial advisors suggest shopping for subprime loans as rates and criteria vary. Some advise against subprime loans due to high interest rates, but they may be necessary in certain situations. The decline in home values in 2006 and 2007 caused many defaults on subprime loans, leading to stricter criteria and higher interest rates.
The term subprime loan is somewhat confusing. Since sub means below, it would be reasonable to assume that a subprime loan is desirable as being lower than the prime interest rate being offered at any given time. In fact, the opposite is true. Subprime lending is offered above the prime interest rate, usually because a person’s credit rating is less than perfect and poses a greater risk that the lender will not be repaid. This means that the person pays more interest on the borrowed money rather than less.
Prime is considered the interest rate at which banks and other lenders will offer loans to customers with the best credit rating. Not all lenders are eligible for the best rates, and these rates vary greatly by market and loan type. Even a subprime loan can vary widely. In fact, most financial advisors suggest shopping if you only qualify for a subprime loan as each lender may have different criteria for determining creditworthiness.
Some financial experts also advise against taking out a loan if you can only get one at a subprime rate, as you’ll end up paying more interest than loans you can get at a prime rate. However, in some cases, it still makes sense to get a subprime loan if the money is really needed and there is no other way to pay off the debts. With home prices falling in some areas since 2006, some people who would have been considered for a subprime loan may not be able to get one.
A number of lenders have focused on lending money at subprime rates to borrowers with less than perfect credit. The ideal for many of these borrowers, who bought homes in 2004-2005, was that the real estate industry was booming and that within a few years of establishing creditworthiness, borrowers would be able to refinance their homes at lower rates. inferior. Some took out interest-only loans with high subprime rates, which meant they weren’t accruing any equity in their homes.
Instead of the housing boom continuing, there was a significant decline in home values in 2006 and 2007. Many people have been unable to refinance their homes at a lower rate, and people with interest-only loans have been stuck with larger payments than they could afford, and homes that were actually worth less than they were at the time of the loan. purchase. The subprime rate didn’t help matters and many people were forced to sell their homes or defaulted on loans. This situation has caused concern among lenders whose main customers are those with subprime loans. A high number of loan defaults due to the inability to make high payments resulted in lenders with less money to lend and lower profits.
In 2007, some lenders instituted stricter criteria for obtaining a subprime loan and also increased the interest rates at which money can be borrowed. This results in fewer home sales, a continued decline in retail home values, and a stagnant housing market. On the other hand, making it harder to get a subprime loan can save some people money and create incentives to boost their credit scores.
Smart Asset.
[ad_2]