[ad_1] Reasonable suspicion is a standard for law enforcement officers to conduct stop and search. It is based on the “reasonable person” and is not as high as probable cause. Terry’s arrest allows for a search for weapons, but refusing to answer questions is not grounds for reasonable suspicion. In United States law, reasonable suspicion […]
[ad_1] Reasonable force is the appropriate amount of force to protect oneself, others, or property from harm, determined by a reasonable and objective observer. It can include lethal force and is used as a defense in court. It varies across jurisdictions and is a major concern for law enforcement. Police are trained to use minimal […]
[ad_1] Reasonable care is the standard used to assess liability in law, based on what a rational and prudent “reasonable person” would do in comparable circumstances. Professionals are held to a higher standard of care based on their qualifications. Common sense and caution can help avoid negligence. Reasonable care is the level of care that […]
[ad_1] The “reasonable person” is a legal concept used in criminal and tort law to determine liability issues. It refers to an average person’s conduct under the same circumstances, but different standards apply based on individual characteristics. Mental capacity is not a factor, but external factors and resources are considered. Children have different standards based […]
[ad_1] Reasonable care, or due diligence, is the expectation that a lawyer fulfills their obligations to a client and follows certain protocols. It is subjective and controversial, but failure to exercise it can result in disbarment. It is not absolute and requires discretion to avoid unethical tactics. It can also apply to government obligations. The […]
