Direct and circumstantial evidence are used in court cases. Direct evidence includes physical objects or eyewitness testimony that prove guilt without doubt. Circumstantial evidence includes events or characterizations that suggest guilt. Both types of evidence are used to help judges and juries make decisions in criminal cases. Physical evidence, including DNA, is highly reliable. Testimony can also be used as circumstantial evidence to prove a suspect’s mental capacity to commit a crime.
There are several types of evidence that can be used in a judicial context. The evidence can be direct or circumstantial. Direct evidence is the elements in a court case that can be seen or some type of eyewitness testimony. Circumstantial evidence is usually a series of events or characterizations that implicate guilt. All of the facts that are gathered for a court case are linked together to help a judge or jury make a decision whether or not to convict someone on trial.
Direct evidence can be physical objects or sworn testimony that lead directly to the crime and the person who committed it. This type of evidence should point to the guilty person and should leave no doubt. It should prove the exact circumstances of the crime.
Physical evidence is a type of direct evidence. This includes items found by crime scene investigators. The physical markings tell the story of how the crime was believed to have occurred. Some of the physical signs can be picked up immediately. This can include broken glass, weapons, drugs and other items left at the scene.
Other physical evidence taken from a crime must be collected and then examined in a laboratory. This could include blood, semen and hair samples. Even if the item is physical, it needs to be sent to a lab to get the results of who or where it came from. Once the lab can provide investigators with a full report on these items, they can often be used to prove guilt in court. DNA is a type of physical evidence that is used in many cases and is considered highly reliable, especially for ruling out suspects.
Circumstantial evidence is any action that can implicate a suspect’s guilt. A person on trial in a criminal case may be asked to disclose what she did in the weeks before or after the crime. The events that occurred during this period could foreshadow that person who committed the crime. An example is a person who practiced with a gun a few weeks before their spouse was murdered. There is no direct link, but it could be suggested that the person used the gun in preparation to commit murder.
Another form of circumstantial evidence is testimony. People who know the person on trial can speak under oath about his character or how he would react in specific situations. This type of testimony is to prove that the suspected person has the mental capacity to commit the crime. It usually takes a combination of circumstantial and direct evidence to convict someone of a crime.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
