[ad_1]
Critical Legal Studies questions the legitimacy of Western legal approach, seeing it as a tool to maintain existing leadership and oppress weaker elements. It began in the 1970s and opposes capitalist economics and individualism. The movement aims to protect the weak from oppression by those in power, viewing law as an instrument of politics.
Critical Legal Studies is an intellectual and legal movement that questions the entire legitimacy of the Western legal approach. This movement, which has a politically leftist origin, sees the legal system as a structural tool that helps maintain existing leadership while reining in the weaker or poorer elements of society. Members of the movement generally do not believe it is reasonable to separate law from politics and see many members of the judiciary as enforcers who use the law as a way to maintain oppression. The movement began in the 1970s and was heavily influenced by the political activism of the 1960s in the United States. Over time, the critical legal studies movement has spread into different ideological groups that often agree on the basic problems, but may differ on proposed solutions.
People who agree with the critical law firm movement are generally strongly opposed to the status quo. For example, most of them tend to disagree with capitalist economics and generally dislike the individualistic viewpoint espoused in most Western societies, instead preferring a more communal philosophy. Those who favor the movement believe that the current legal system plays a role in helping maintain these structures, and therefore think it needs to be changed, or at least viewed from a different perspective.
The law firm critique movement is very concerned with helping to protect the weak from oppression by the powerful, and those who follow it see the current legal system as an enemy in that battle. They believe that even when the law appears to favor the weak, it will tend to be skewed so that it works for those already in power. So, for example, the law is often used by racial majorities to hurt and weaken minorities, or by men to gain a status advantage over women.
People in the critical law studies movement believe that the perception of a difference between law and politics is actually a myth. They see the law as an instrument of politics, or even as a separate kind of politics in and of itself. Many people in the movement also suggest that the law is nearly meaningless because it is so widely open to different interpretations. There is a belief that this openness to interpretation will almost always be skewed in favor of those already running things, while preventing outsiders from having a say in leadership.
[ad_2]