Pre-settlement loans provide plaintiffs with cash advances before their lawsuit is settled or won. These loans are often used in personal injury cases and are non-recourse, meaning the plaintiff does not have to repay if they lose. The terms of these loans vary, and they can be expensive. Some attorneys may be hesitant to participate, and agreements must be carefully drafted to avoid legal issues.
Pre-settlement loans are a method used by litigation plaintiffs to get the money they need before their lawsuit is done. These settlements give plaintiffs the opportunity to receive cash advances in anticipation of settling the lawsuit or winning the trial. This type of arrangement, often referred to as a statutory loan, is generally non-recourse in nature, meaning that a plaintiff who fails to settle or win a lawsuit will not be required to repay any funds previously advanced by the lender. If the party in question prevails, the agreed percentage of the economic premium must be paid, as well as any fees ascertained by the lender pursuant to the contract.
Personal injury matters are the predominant type of lawsuit for which pre-settlement loans are made. The often lengthy and costly process of such litigation commonly leaves plaintiffs in difficult financial circumstances while their case is pending in the courts, particularly if they are unable to work. In such cases, plaintiffs may decide to contact a lawsuit finance company, which in turn will request detailed information from the loan applicant’s attorney regarding the claims made, the evidence available to support those claims, and their monetary value. valued. After the lender completes a detailed review of the merits of the dispute, an acceptable loan amount will be determined, along with detailed contract terms and associated fees.
The terms of pre-settlement loans often vary significantly, depending on the nature of the litigation, the prospects of achieving a favorable outcome, and the lender’s assessment of the potential award value. The non-recourse nature of these contracts requires lenders to assume a significant amount of risk, a fact which is reflected in the substantial transaction fees that generally accompany these loans. Some pre-settlement loans are made on an upfront fee schedule, but other arrangements assess fees on a periodic basis from the date of the prepayment through the loan repayment date to offset issues arising from protracted litigation. Some lenders offer to advance only relatively small percentages of anticipated premium amounts, and others are willing to provide significantly larger loans based on the perceived strength of the party’s claims.
It is not uncommon for pre-settlement loans to be considered a last resort option for cash-strapped plaintiffs struggling to stay afloat, due to their very costly nature. In some jurisdictions, there are additional legal and ethical considerations that may require further caution by prospective borrowers. Some attorneys are reluctant or unwilling to participate in a lender’s case evaluation process, greatly reducing their client’s chances of getting a down payment. Even pre-transaction agreements of this type must be carefully drafted to define the sums transferred not as loans, but rather as cash advances made in exchange for a percentage of any future financial recognition. In this way, the very high fees charged under such contracts may escape classification as a type of usurious interest often prohibited by law.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
