[ad_1]
Leniency is the act of reducing a sentence for a convicted criminal. It can be seen as a virtue or weakness depending on cultural and societal norms. Judges must consider various factors before being harsh or lenient. Perpetual leniency may create a sense of permissiveness, as seen in public opinion towards celebrities and their behavior.
Leniency is the practice or tendency to forgive, mercy, or compassion when retributing for a crime after conviction. It does not affect the investigation, arrest or trial process, but only comes into play after someone has been convicted of a crime and the punishment has been decided. In this regard, leniency is the act of imposing or allowing a reduction of the sentence for a person who inflicts a less harsh punishment on the individual. Some defendants will openly seek such leniency and throw themselves into the “mercy of the court” in hopes of being pardoned, even though this may sometimes work against them.
Many cultures and religions consider mercy and forgiveness, at least for those who truly seek it, a virtue. For some, demonstrating leniency can equally be seen as a highly commendable or even moral act. Among other people, however, such carelessness may be seen as a weakness, and displays of leniency towards those who violate society’s rules may be seen as an affront to social norms. For these reasons, a judge deciding on punishment for an offender must consider many aspects of a crime before choosing to be particularly harsh or lenient.
A judge who often shows leniency in sentencing certain types of convicted defendants is likely to find respect, condemnation, or both from the general public. This has a lot to do with both the general attitude of citizens in a specific area, and the types of crimes a judge is considered to lenient. Some communities will go to their judges to show leniency against certain types of petty crimes. Similarly, crimes committed by young people may be considered less offensive and due more to the malicious nature of immaturity and adolescence than to any pernicious intent. Extreme crimes committed by youths, however, are often called upon to suffer harsh punishments to serve as an example to other rebellious youths who may find themselves in situations where equally malicious acts become viable.
There are concerns among some researchers, legal professionals, and behavioral psychologists that perpetual leniency shown toward a certain individual, group, or type of crime may create in others a sense of permissiveness toward the person or act. This can often be seen in public opinion regarding celebrities and criminal or socially immoral behavior, such as drunk driving or indecent conduct. Some celebrities are seen as able to buy their way out of any slight, and this kind of cynicism not only infects others, but can also give celebrities a jaded sense of acceptable behavior. This type of acceptance model can have the reverse effect of showing intolerance to such individuals, as a backlash from popular opinion turns against them.
[ad_2]