[ad_1]
A beta reader is an unpaid person who examines a piece of fiction for errors and provides feedback on characterization and storyline. They are valuable to authors in improving the quality of their work before professional review. The term is borrowed from the software industry, and many websites provide directories of betas. Authors who use betas can improve their work, and betas are usually thanked in acknowledgments.
A beta reader is someone who agrees to examine a piece of fiction for spelling, grammar, characterization, and continuity errors. Unlike a real editor, a beta reader is typically not paid and sees work in a very rough state. Many authors like to use betas to improve the quality of their work before submitting it for professional review and critique, and betas are usually widely thanked in acknowledgments of the time and energy they have invested in the work.
The term is borrowed from the software industry, which uses “beta” to describe an imperfect release. This release is used by beta testers, who seek to identify problems with the software before it’s used by the general public. These beta testers often try to deliberately crack the software, looking for any weaknesses that could create problems, and a good beta reader, or beta, does the same.
The duties of a beta are myriad. In addition to serving as a general proofreader looking for typographical errors, the beta also looks for flaws in characterization and storyline. The beta could question why a character does or doesn’t do something, or how someone ends up in France with no apparent explanation halfway through the third chapter. Authors sometimes miss these flaws as they’re caught up in the bigger whole, so a beta player is especially valuable.
Many websites provide directories of betas, which usually specify what type of fiction they like to work on. Some, for example, may specialize in fan fiction, while others like to work on fiction novels intended for professional publication. In some cases, a beta agrees to edit in exchange for the beta reading their work, in a quid pro quo trade. The best beta is unknown to the author, and therefore able to provide a useful and honest critique of the work.
Any author who figures they don’t need a beta is sadly mistaken. Beta readers will only improve the quality of a written work, even though they can sometimes offer very severe criticism. Many authors like to use more betas to solicit broader opinions, making their work even better. In rare cases, a beta reader can be overly harsh or even mean, but these betas are very unusual. Most are supporting critics who offer meaningful and thoughtful commentary on the work.
[ad_2]