Illinois House Bill 1500 created Class X felonies for violent crimes in 1978. Offenders receive a specified prison term with no parole, and repeat offenders face doubled sentences. Judges must consider mitigating and aggravating factors and document their justifications. The mandatory life sentence for third-time offenders may face constitutional challenges. The Class X law is not considered cruel and unusual punishment.
House Bill 1500, passed by the Illinois State Legislature in February 1978, created a new class of felonies known as Class X felonies. The primary goals behind the legislation were to strengthen punishments for violent offenders and address flagrant inconsistencies in convictions for comparable crimes. A Class X felony, under the bill, is a violent crime, such as rape, armed robbery, treason, and the manufacture or sale of narcotics.
Under the statute, judges will sentence Class X offenders to a specified number of years in prison, based on the nature of the crime. The offenders will serve the full term, with no possibility of parole except for time off calculated for good behavior.
The Class X bill also significantly changed prison sentences for repeat offenders. Sentences for felons who were convicted twice of the same Class X crime have doubled. The statute also doubles the sentences for particularly egregious or heinous crimes, with willful cruelty. Habitual offenders, with three or more Class X felony convictions, receive mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole. Penalties for Class X offenses range from six to 30 years.
Equal protection concerns require courts to treat defendants who committed similar crimes in similar circumstances in nearly the same way. Class X law spelled out mitigating and aggravating factors for judges to consider when determining an appropriate sentence. Furthermore, such elements must be specified in writing in order to justify the harshness or leniency of a sentence. Such written justifications document due process in accordance with the 14th Amendment, in which the reasons for a judgment are stated clearly so that a person of average intelligence can understand and agree.
The mandatory life sentence of the Class X law may face some scathing constitutional scrutiny. Federal courts have declared some mandatory sentences unconstitutional. There should be alternative sanctions for third time offenders where there are extenuating circumstances for the offence. In addition, Article I, Section 11 of the Illinois Constitution requires that penalties must balance the rehabilitation and correctional goals of the prison. Mandatory life imprisonment, while it may fit the offense, may not take into account the offender’s capacity for rehabilitation, although the commission of three violent offenses could legitimately be argued to show a poor prognosis for rehabilitation.
Another potential point of constitutional challenge could be the bans in the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution against cruel and unusual punishments. The Supreme Court has ruled that a punishment is cruel and unusual if it is grossly disproportionate to the crime and outside the bounds of what civil society deems acceptable. A punishment that intentionally and punitively inflicts suffering is also prohibited. Most legal experts agree that the Class X judgment complies with these requirements.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
