A fraudulent transfer is when someone transfers property to defraud or avoid a debt. It can occur with any asset that can satisfy a creditor’s credit. A creditor can win a case if they prove the debtor owed a debt, transferred ownership, and intended to defraud. If proven, the transfer is void, and the creditor can collect the asset to satisfy their claims.
A fraudulent transfer occurs when someone transfers property with the intent to defraud another person or with the intent to hinder, delay, or avoid a debt or legal obligation. First, it arises when a debtor is attempting to prevent a creditor from accessing the debtor’s assets. In such a case, the debtor can transfer his assets to a third party in order to prevent the creditor from using those assets to satisfy the outstanding claims. The transfer is usually made only in name, which means that the debtor does not actually intend to relinquish ownership of the asset.
A fraudulent transfer can occur with respect to any type of asset that can be used to satisfy a creditor’s credit. For example, someone who gives away a house or car to a third party to avoid paying a creditor may be accused of fraudulent move-in. In many jurisdictions, however, creditors cannot reach the debtor’s personal assets, such as furniture, dishes or clothing.
Typically, a creditor has legal recourse if he can prove that a debtor has committed a fraudulent transfer. As a general rule, to win a fraudulent transfer case against a debtor, the creditor must prove three things. First, the obligee normally has to prove that he actually has a right to claim the assets. In other words, the debtor must have owed the creditor a legitimate debt at the time the debtor transferred an asset to a third party.
Secondly, the obligee usually has to prove that the obligee actually made a transfer of ownership to a third party. Finally, the creditor must prove that the debtor intended to defraud the creditor in making the transfer. This can be inferred from the circumstances surrounding the transfer. For example, the transfer of assets at significantly less than the assets’ fair value may demonstrate an intention to make the assets unavailable to a creditor. Other factors that a judge or jury may weigh in determining intent are whether the transfer was made to a relative of the debtor, whether the debtor actually retained control over the asset, whether the transfer was concealed, and whether the debtor is became insolvent as a result of the transfer .
If a creditor can prove all of these, a judge or jury will likely find that a fraudulent transfer has occurred. The transport is then normally declared void. This effectively allows the creditor to pursue the collection of the asset in order to satisfy his claims against the debtor.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
