Penumbra is a legal concept that implies rights not explicitly stated in the law. It is based on the idea that a law can imply rights without stating them openly. The right to privacy is an example of penumbra, and it is difficult to challenge due to established case law. The term is borrowed from astronomy and is a legal gray area. Jurists, advocates, and judges use this theory to interpret the law and add meaning to it over time.
In a legal sense, a penumbra is a logical extension of a rule, law, or legal statement that provides people with rights not explicitly outlined in the law. This concept dates back to 19th century legal precedents in the United States. Judge Oliver Wendell Holmes has contributed significantly to the body of legal discussion on this concept and has referred to it in several court cases. One of the most famous invocations of legal twilight occurred in the 1965 case of Griswold v Connecticut.
In the logic of this legal theory, a law can imply rights without stating them openly. As long as a reasonable interpretation of a law could provide for a given right, a judge could argue that a legal matter falls within the penumbra of the law. While the reasoning may be somewhat shaky and the legal basis may be difficult to prove, if lawyers and judges can argue the matter persuasively, people may accept it.
The right to privacy is a prime example of penumbra. Many people believe that this right is enshrined in the US Constitution. It actually isn’t. Instead, judges and jurists argue that provisions like the First Amendment include the right to privacy in their twilight, and numerous legal cases have established a body of case law to support this belief, making it difficult to challenge. In Griswold v Connecticut, a challenge to the ban on contraceptive sales, the argument was that this law violated marital privacy and, by extension, the First Amendment.
This term is borrowed from astronomy, where penumbra is the shaded area surrounding a total eclipse. Rather than being definitively defined in a law, rights are implied in the penumbra, making it a bit of a legal gray area. The rationale used by a lawyer or scholar when presenting evidence to attach a certain right to a certain rule of law can be challenged, using supporting documents such as other laws, documents of people who participated in drafting the law, and so on.
Jurists, advocates, and judges rely on theories like this to interpret the law, adding meaning and depth to it over time. If people are to read the law literally, they can find loopholes that make it difficult to judge certain types of cases fairly. The law often has trouble keeping up with society, and being able to extend logical rights to people based on precedents and implications in existing law is an important legal tool.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
