[ad_1]
Projective tests in psychology involve exposing subjects to ambiguous stimuli to elicit subconscious responses. Examples include the Rorschach test and drawing exercises, but their subjective interpretation raises questions about their reliability and validity.
A projective test is a tool used in psychotherapy and psychology in which the subject is exposed to an ambiguous stimulus such as an abstract image or an incomplete sentence and the test administrator notes the subject’s response. The idea behind such tests is that when people are prompted with concrete stimuli, they respond with their conscious mind, while ambiguous stimuli can elicit responses from the subconscious, giving the test administrator a better idea of what is going on. inside of. Some people, including people in the psychology community, have criticized projective tests, arguing that they have a number of flaws that raise questions about how valuable they are.
In a projective test, the subject is forced to project internal thoughts, feelings, beliefs, and ideas onto the stimulus because it alone does not provide enough information. In the Rorschach test, a famous example of a projective test, for example, people are shown a series of inkblots and asked to respond. The spots themselves are random in nature, but in trying to describe and order the spots, the subject may ascribe characteristics to them, such as “this spot looks like a butterfly.”
Another example of a projective test is a test in which people are shown a photograph or drawing depicting an ambiguous scene and asked to explain what is happening in the scene and provide insight into what happens next. Similarly, people may be asked to draw people or scenes. Some psychologists believe that some unconscious personality traits can be expressed during drawing exercises.
Responses to stimuli are thought to provide insight into internal thought processes. When people are taught to use projective testing materials during clinical training, they are provided with tools to interpret the results. However, part of the problem is that interpretation is subjective. When someone takes a full-sentence test, for example, two different psychotherapy professionals can make very different assessments based on the subject’s responses.
To work well as a test, something must have both reliability and validity. If a test could be given to multiple people who all get results that can be objectively measured, it is reliable; it can be repeated in different environments and consistent results can be obtained. For example, a multiple-choice exam is highly reliable. Projective tests, on the other hand, are not as reliable because the results are subjective. Validity explores whether or not the test measures what it claims to measure, and this too has been questioned with these types of psychological tests.
[ad_2]