A catch-up strategy is an accounting practice used to claim tax deductions at the end of the year for expenses incurred at the beginning of the year. It is often used by limited partnerships and as part of a tax shelter strategy, but is no longer permissible in some countries. Limitations are often placed on the type and amount of expenses that can be incurred and applied elsewhere to prevent abuse.
The approach is an accounting strategy that is sometimes used to claim tax deductions at the end of the calendar or business year that relate to expenses incurred at the beginning of the year. This approach is sometimes employed by companies that are set up as limited partnerships, as well as part of a tax shelter strategy. While still permitted in many areas, this type of strategy is no longer considered permissible in a number of nations around the world. When it is still an option, the scope is often limited to use in specific situations.
In practice, a catch-up strategy allows you to delay applying for certain deductions in one quarter, in anticipation of applying them in a different quarter. For example, a business may choose to wait until the fourth quarter to claim deductions related to expenses incurred during the first quarter. This is accomplished by going back to any previous unclaimed deductions and applying them to income and expenses that were generated during that fourth quarter. Depending on the financial circumstances that prevailed during the last quarter of the year, carrying out a recovery could result in a significant reduction in the tax burden.
While there are countries where the use of a contact return is still considered legal, it is not unusual for the tax agencies of those nations to place limitations on the type and amount of such expenses that can be incurred on a portion of the year and applied elsewhere. The idea behind these limitations is that companies where seasonality impacts the company’s overall operating structure may still have the benefit of using tax deductions where they are most useful, thus helping the business remain operational throughout the calendar year. At the same time, the limitations help minimize the possibility of abuse by companies that do not experience seasonal fluctuations in their income streams and find it easier to operate at the same level of production throughout the year.
Abuse is often the reason cited for limiting or completely prohibiting scope as a legitimate accounting practice. Depending on how the tax laws are written, this type of strategy can work as a great loophole that makes it easy to reduce the tax burden in a wide range of situations. For this reason, more agencies during the latter part of the 20th century began to take a close look at how companies of various sizes were making use of scope and began implementing changes to tax regulations that effectively eliminated some of those applications. Proponents of these limitations support the idea that doing so can prevent companies from gaining an unfair advantage when paying taxes. Opponents of backtracking limitations sometimes view attempts to moderate the use of this strategy as counterproductive in encouraging business growth.
Smart Asset.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
