A requirements contract is a legally binding agreement between a buyer and supplier, where the supplier provides an unspecified amount of a product or service to meet the buyer’s needs. The buyer is restricted from using other suppliers, but the lack of specified quantities can present risks for both parties. However, both parties can benefit from the exclusive customer-supplier relationship. The contract is enforceable in court, and breach can result in a monetary remedy.
A contract is a legally binding agreement. A requirements contract, therefore, is a legally binding agreement that addresses requirements that one party may have regarding products or services offered by another party. The deal generally involves the supplier offering an unlimited supply and the buyer agreeing to buy only from a single source.
Contract terms are often very specific. For example, quantity is generally a very important aspect of commercial contracts. With a requirements contract, however, this is not the case. Most requirements contracts are not for any specific quantity. Instead, these deals focus more on need and availability.
Usually a requirements contract is established between a buyer and a supplier. This type of agreement usually requires the supplier to provide an unspecified amount of a product or service. This amount should be sufficient to meet the needs of the buyer. Since the supplier strives to meet the needs of the buyer, the buyer is generally prohibited from using other suppliers.
The needs of a catalog call center can help illustrate how a contract with requirements works. XYZ Jewelry Company can generally take more phone orders than its staff can handle. To solve this problem, XYZ can sign a contract with Hello Call Center to handle all excess calls. Hello Call Center can agree and restrict XYZ from sending calls to any other call center.
It is important to note that the lack of specified quantities could present a risk to suppliers. This is because a supplier may hold certain stocks of a product in anticipation of buyer orders. The buyer, however, is obligated to buy only what he needs. It could be nothing. There is also a degree of risk for buyers. By binding to a single supplier, a buyer can miss out on more competitive offers.
However, both a buyer and a seller can benefit from a contract with requirements. The supplier benefits because he gets an exclusive customer. The buyer can benefit because he is not dealing with multiple suppliers for a single product or service. In addition, the buyer does not have to worry about whether his requests will be fulfilled.
The lack of specifics could lead a person to believe that a requirements contract is not enforceable in a court of law. This is not true. In most cases, both parties can breach the contract and be sued.
For example, a supplier could be sued if the buyer tries to place an order which is rejected because the supplier does not have the agreed upon products. A buyer could be sued if the supplier discovers that the buyer has purchased the contract product elsewhere. In both cases, a monetary remedy can be ordered.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
