An amphibolism error is a logic error caused by ambiguity or misunderstanding due to poor grammar, punctuation, or word choice. It can be used for comedic effect and should be cleared up in an argument. Improper use of pronouns is a common cause. Comedian Groucho Marx famously used it in a joke.
An amphibolism error is a logic error or error that results from ambiguity or misunderstanding due to grammar, usually through poor punctuation or word choice. This can be an error that is used on purpose, or it can happen accidentally due to hastily used or unmodified language. The nature of this type of fallacy is ambiguity which means that the argument supported by such a fallacy can easily be challenged by addressing the different possible meanings. An amphibole error can also be used to great comic effect, as the sentence plays on ambiguity for comic purposes.
As a fallacy of ambiguity, an amphibole fallacy can be quite similar to a misunderstanding fallacy, although there are differences between the two. This type of error occurs due to a grammatical problem that creates ambiguity or the possibility of confusion. Misunderstanding, on the other hand, is ambiguity that occurs as a result of poor word choice, usually due to someone using a word that they feel has a particular meaning, which can have numerous meanings that can be used to point out the weakness of a given argument. Both types of fallacies create ambiguous meaning in a statement and should be cleared up as part of an argument.
Improper use of punctuation or pronouns is often responsible for creating an amphibole error. For example, if someone says, “The doctor wanted to operate on the patient, but he wasn’t ready,” the “he” is ambiguous and could refer to both the doctor and the patient. While this might not have a huge impact on what that particular phrase means, usage like “The doctor wanted to operate on the patient, but he died before the surgery” could mean two very different things depending on who “he” is. refers in the sentence. This kind of mistake can easily end up in a debate or other argument, with ambiguous pronouns obscuring the true meaning of a statement.
Comedians often use an amphibolic fallacy to great effect, as ambiguity can create the comedy within a joke. Comedian Groucho Marx famously used the amphibole in the line “One morning I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How he got into my pajamas I’ll never know.” This, of course, uses the amphibole in the second line; the initial setup has the listener imagine the speaker in his pajamas as he shoots an elephant. The fallacy of the amphibole occurs in the listener’s mind and is used to make the punchline of the joke surprising, as Marx indicates that somehow the elephant was the one wearing the pajamas.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
