In personam is a legal term meaning an action against an individual rather than a company or body. It requires a judgment enforced against a specific person named in the lawsuit and must establish competent jurisdiction. It is crucial in matters of financial remuneration, obligation, or obfuscation. The case must be brought in the specific jurisdiction of the defendant, and cases adjudicated in rem must be filed in the jurisdiction where the property is located. The jurisdiction in which a person resides has the power and authority to direct judgment against that person, allowing for the international reach of such cases.
In personam is a Latin phrase which literally means “against the person” or “directed towards a certain person”. It is traditionally used as a legal term implying an action against an individual rather than a company or local, regional or national body. An in personam claim requires a judgment that is only enforced against a specific person named in the lawsuit. Such a lawsuit must begin with formal service of a subpoena by a court official, and that claim must then establish competent jurisdiction in the case. This structure is crucial in determining whether a complaint will be judged in personam, in rem, or nearly in rem.
One of the main areas of the legal process where a person would be named as a defendant in personam is in matters of financial remuneration, obligation or obfuscation. This designation means that the judgment is against the particular person and carries the full weight of the potential fines and punishments prescribed by governmental jurisdiction. This fact alone is why such a designation is vital to the adjudication of such a case. It corresponds directly to how a case is conducted and how the punishment or sanction is meted out. Cases where the defendant is exonerated of any wrongdoing still carry the designation of an in personam sentence.
In order for a plaintiff to bring a claim against an individual, the case must be brought in the specific jurisdiction of the defendant. Inexperienced claimants or those who have not procured the services of a suitable counsel often make the mistake of filing personal complaints in a court of their jurisdiction. Bringing the lawsuit to the defendant’s competent court is necessary because only the defendant’s jurisdiction is able to enforce a judgment in personam if the defendant is found liable or guilty in the proceeding. In contrast, cases that are adjudicated in rem — a claim seeking to determine the status of a personal asset or public property — typically must be filed in the jurisdiction where the property is located.
The fact that the jurisdiction in which a person resides has the power and authority to direct judgment against that person is at the heart of nearly every precept of civil law. It is the foundation that allows for the international reach of such cases. Any claimant residing anywhere in the world may bring a claim in the local or regional jurisdiction of a person they believe has wronged them. For all cases — local or international — other factors such as statute of limitations and the defendant’s ability to exhibit sui juris, or the ability to stand trial with full legal competence, come into play, and often inhibit a case’s ability to move forward. forward for the process.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
