Piecework pays workers based on what they produce, rather than a fixed hourly wage. It has been used in the clothing, textile, and electronics industries, but has been debated for its potential harm to workers. Piecework has a long history, dating back to the 1500s, and is often associated with handkerchief work. Some modern factories still use this system, and proponents argue that it rewards workers for excelling and promotes efficiency. Opponents argue that it can be dangerous and undervalues quality over quantity.
When someone is hired to do piecemeal work, they are paid based on what is produced, rather than receiving a fixed hourly wage. This is closely associated with the clothing and textile industry and is also used to assemble some electronic components. It has also been the subject of historical debate, as some opponents believe piecework is harmful to workers, while proponents argue that it supports a free-market economy. Both sides have valid points and some governments have made efforts to address the issue.
The concept of piecework is quite old. In the English language, the idea of jobs taken home by apprentices dates back to the 1500s. The development of assembly line systems further promoted the concept, as it is suited to making a small part of a single individual. As a result, piecework is often connected with handkerchief work in many people’s minds, as it was often performed under grueling conditions and accompanied by long hours. In some cases, it can even be done at home, which has raised questions about labor regulation, as the home is not an environment that is easily regulated or inspected.
With the development of factories, many companies have adopted the traditional parts processing system. Factory workers logged the amount of work they completed, typically by submitting tracking hubs to a foreman who double-checked the work before signing it off so the employees could get paid. Some modern factories continue to use this system, especially in developing countries.
Piecework is considered an excellent example of performance-related pay, as the amount of take-home pay is directly related to the worker’s performance. Proponents of these systems argue that workers are rewarded for excelling, while slower workers are fairly compensated for their hard work. By directly tying pay to the quantity of items produced, this encourages workers to complete tasks at a high rate of speed, translating into greater efficiency for the firm that hires the workers.
Opponents of piecework point out that the high rate of speed can be dangerous to workers and that it can promote injury, not efficiency. Concerns have also been raised about the amount of pay they receive, with some labor advocates arguing that slower workers are not, in fact, compensated enough. This method of compensation also places a value on quantity rather than quality, which may not be desired.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
