Risk compensation theory explains how people respond to a perceived reduction in risk by acting less cautiously, often observed in the use of safety equipment in the automotive and cycling industries. This behavior can also be seen in businesses where employees or managers receive compensation regardless of risks taken.
Risk compensation typically refers to an observed human behavior in which a person responds to a perceived reduction in risk by acting less confidently. This is often discussed in terms of motor vehicle safety features, and many car manufacturers consider how this behavior might affect the actual safety of a vehicle. The general way this type of compensation works is that a person essentially has an unconscious amount of risk that they tolerate, as perceived risk decreases and therefore personal risks may increase accordingly. Risk compensation can also be used to loosely refer to compensation given to employees or managers without consideration of the risks taken.
Risk compensation theory is often used in a number of different fields and relates largely to observed human behaviors. Much of the theory arose from research into the use of automotive and cycling safety equipment, with the revelation that even as such vehicles had become safer, the number of crashes and injuries had generally remained the same. This is attributed to the idea of risk compensation. The basic theory states that people are willing to accept a certain amount of risk on a subconscious level; as perceived risks decrease, for example through the development of more safety devices, their actions actually become riskier.
Risk compensation is often used in the automotive industry, although it can be applied to other businesses as well. While many vehicles are designed to be much safer than ever before, research seems to indicate that this only leads drivers to take more risks and drive more recklessly. This has led to much debate about the effectiveness of vehicle safety equipment and standards, as little practical evidence supports that these features actually save lives or reduce injuries. Risk compensation can also be observed with regard to cyclists, as it has been noted that drivers take more chances and approach cyclists who wear helmets.
The term “risk offset” can also be used more flexibly in a business context. This usage often refers to financial compensation given to employees or managers regardless of the risks assumed and any failures that may be observed. While this type of risk compensation does not affect all businesses, it is often seen with risk-taking managers or corporate officers who lose money to employees or investors, but still receive standard compensation. This type of behavior is often frowned upon by consumers and the general public, even though it can be seen as a way to promote innovative risk-taking for the benefit of a company.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
