Roe v Wade legalized first trimester abortion in America in 1973, protected by a citizen’s right to privacy. The decision set a national standard for states to follow, but later court decisions undermined portions of it. The decision is controversial and has been appealed many times.
Roe v Wade was a landmark Supreme Court decision in 1973 that legalized first trimester abortion for American women. The Court ruled that first trimester abortion was protected by a citizen’s right to privacy. Roe v Wade galvanized both sides of the abortion debate and is often cited as a turning point in the history of reproductive and women’s rights in America.
Roe v Wade began with a pregnant woman from Texas who was given the alias Jane Roe, along with another pregnant woman from Georgia. Both women came from states with heavy proscriptions against abortion and challenged the legality of state laws in the Supreme Court. Ultimately, the Supreme Court ruled that the state’s restrictions on first trimester abortion conflicted with the Fourteenth Amendment.
The actual content of Roe v Wade is a source of some confusion. The decision did not legalize all abortions, but only abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy. Roe v Wade also ruled that only qualified medical professionals should perform abortions. After the first trimester, individual states can enact their own laws, as long as the legislation is “reasonably related to maternal health,” according to the text of the decision. After a fetus reaches a viable age, states can restrict abortion in various ways, including an outright ban.
Prior to Roe v Wade, abortion was regulated on a state-by-state basis. There were a variety of abortion laws, with many states banning it outright. Other states required proof of extenuating medical conditions, such as threatening the mother’s life, to approve an abortion. Roe v Wade set a national standard for states to follow, although later court decisions, such as Planned Parenthood v Casey in 1992, undermined portions of Roe v Wade.
Many opponents of Roe v Wade have suggested that the decision was in fact unconstitutional, because the Constitution does not guarantee a right to privacy, although it does guarantee other personal rights. The Fourteenth Amendment includes a clause on restrictions on personal liberty, which was presumably the section of the amendment that Justice Harry Blackmun, who wrote the majority opinion, had in mind. The Supreme Court is charged with interpreting the intent of the Constitution, and proponents of the Roe v Wade decision argued that the majority’s decision reflected the intent of a right to privacy for Americans.
Roe v Wade is a controversial judicial decision and has been appealed many times since 1973. The text of the majority decision reflects the controversy, with Justice Blackmun commenting on the sensitive nature of the decision and indicating that the Supreme Court has attempted to reach a decision based on legal precedent rather than for emotional or moral reasons. The majority opinion in the case appears to have stood the test of time and legal process, however, and is considered an important part of the body of American legal literature.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
