[ad_1]
Say’s Law states that products are used to acquire more products in a free market economy. People sell goods and services to earn money to buy other goods and services. The law implies that there should be no large excesses or shortages in the market. However, government control and money can disrupt the natural relationship between supply and demand.
Say’s Law, also known as the Law of Markets, is an economic concept that states that products are used as a means of acquiring more products. That is, people sell products or services to earn money to buy other products or services. Although the concept had been affirmed by others before him, Jean-Baptiste Say, a French businessman and economist, is credited for the law. The law applies specifically to market economies, or economies driven by free and open supply and demand. Economies controlled by government or other external forces may not follow Say’s Law, as products are not necessarily bought and sold with the goal of buying more products.
Observation of simple economic systems shows that, at a basic level, Say’s law is true and is generally correct. People work to provide goods and services in order to receive money, which serves as a means of acquiring other products and services. Goods and services, therefore, are sold so that people can receive more goods and services; throughout the economic system, people produce in order to consume. It is important to note that this law applies to both products and services; there is a supply and a demand for both, and both are important parts of the economy.
Say’s law has many important implications for any market economy that its apparent relative simplicity may not immediately reveal. The idea that the production of goods leads to the consumption of goods and vice versa means that, if the law is true, there should never be any large excesses or shortages in the market. There could still be small fluctuations, but they would quickly correct as production shifts to meet demand. Many argue that the law and its positive consequences can only apply in a perfect free market economy: any government control or influence by outside forces can render the law unenforceable. Interestingly enough, however, Jean-Baptiste Say himself advocated for public works and government aid to keep people employed.
Economies around the world have experienced various long-term crises that wouldn’t have to happen if Say’s law were true. Some, therefore, conclude that Say’s law is inaccurate; others, on the other hand, simply believe that the necessary conditions for law do not exist. For example, the law requires a perfect barter system of trade; money and credit tend to disrupt this and cause disturbances in the system. Furthermore, government interaction is evident in nearly every economic system that has ever existed. Such government interaction disrupts the natural relationship between supply and demand which is a necessary prerequisite for the accuracy of Say’s law.
[ad_2]