“Take no prisoners” is an aggressive stance originating from combat, but now used in various contexts. It implies a lack of mercy and can be applied to politics, athletics, parenting, and more. While it can limit mercy, it can also lead to success when pursuing a goal.
While the phrase “take no prisoners” sounds merciful on the surface, it usually refers to taking an overly aggressive stance in a particular situation. It usually implies that someone lacks mercy, but its wide range of applications doesn’t always translate into being ruthless. The probable origin of the phrase is as a command in combat, implying that opposing forces would be killed rather than spared and taken into custody.
“Take no prisoners” would not be a common military command in modern times. Killing wounded or surrendered soldiers is considered an international war crime. Fighting so that there are no longer any surrenders or so that people are killed rather than injured, however, would be a style of warfare that isn’t technically illegal.
A similar expression is the British military term for “give no quarter”. This can also be translated as aggressive in combat. The term “neighborhood” essentially refers to the ways of life of the inmates. Thus, giving no quarter can be interpreted to have the same meaning as taking no prisoners.
In modern usage, one might see “taking no prisoners” applied to a person’s approach to politics or athletics, written and visual arts styles, or speaking skills. It could also reflect on a person’s parenting skills or other lifestyles. For example, the phrase might be used for a book that includes highly graphic violence and is written in a style that spares the reader no detail. A parent who punishes all children for one child’s misbehavior or punishes children for minor transgressions might take a “take no prisoners” approach. A politician who delivers an aggressive and vengeful speech against an opposing party could be considered to have this type of attitude.
This style often implies a vision of the world in limited terms because there is no dimension in which mercy can be treated. Instead, there is only active and direct aggression from which no one is spared. In this mindset there are no extenuating circumstances of injury or surrender, or their equivalents in non-military contexts.
However, aggressive or decisive action is not always a bad thing. A person who relentlessly pursues a goal and is not distracted by difficulties along the way can be quite successful. A student battling ill health or lack of money and is able to graduate may have done so aggressively, but with positive results. Sometimes a goal requires a one-sided focus to achieve.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
