The Bradley effect is when non-white political candidates perform better in polls than in actual elections against white candidates. It is named after Tom Bradley, an African American man who lost the 1982 California gubernatorial race despite leading in polls. The phenomenon is thought to be caused by racial biases and conservative-leaning swing voters. While it appears to be diminishing, it still poses a problem for minority candidates. An interesting reversal occurred in Iowa in 2008 when Barack Obama fared better than expected against Hillary Clinton.
The Bradley effect is a phenomenon characterized by the tendency for non-white political candidates to perform better in opinion polls than in actual elections when running against white candidates. More specifically, this effect often affects black politicians, although it can just as easily affect Hispanics and other minorities. This interesting phenomenon has been the subject of intense study by pollsters, political analysts, and others, and there are several theories used to explain the Bradley effect, which is also sometimes known as the Wilder effect.
The concept is named after Tom Bradley, an African American man who ran for Governor of California in 1982. In polls leading up to the election, Bradley had a clear lead, and numerous media outlets boldly projected that he would win the election. On election night, however, he lost to the Republican nominee, much to the puzzlement of the Democratic party and many Californians. The same thing happened in Virginia in another 1989 gubernatorial race, and numerous other instances of the Bradley effect have been documented at various points in American history.
One of the main explanations for this phenomenon is racial. Pollsters have suggested that voters may not want to admit they want to vote against a black candidate, because they fear being perceived as racist, especially when the pollster is black. Polling organizations have also suggested that the Bradley effect could be caused by swing voters, many of whom are leaning in a conservative direction on election night.
This effect appears to be diminishing in American society, for a variety of reasons, but it’s still an interesting current problem. Researchers are curious about the mechanisms of this phenomenon in hopes of learning more about American politics and cultural beliefs. The rise of minority candidates in the United States will no doubt, and somewhat sadly, provide more instances of the Bradley Effect, as Hispanics, Asians, and other minorities attempt to disrupt American politics at the state and national levels.
In 2008, an interesting reversal of the Bradley effect occurred in Iowa, when black Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama fared better than expected against white candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, in that state’s caucuses. Some political pundits have suggested that because the caucuses are public, some voters may have felt pressured to support Obama out of a desire to appear liberal and open-minded in front of their neighbors.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
