[wpdreams_ajaxsearchpro_results id=1 element='div']

What’s the comparative method in linguistics?

[ad_1]

The comparative method in linguistics compares languages to determine their relationship and common mother tongue. It uses regular sound change principles and word correspondences to reconstruct hypothetical mother tongues, such as Proto-Indo-European. Anomalies are explained by other sound-changing rules or chronological order. The comparative method is an essential tool for historical linguistics.

In linguistics, the comparative method is a standardized way of comparing different languages ​​in order to determine their relationship to each other. The comparative method is based on the principle of regular sound change, which holds that any change in the sounds of a language that occurs over time occurs on a regular basis, without exception. Languages ​​are analyzed using the comparative method to determine whether they share a common mother tongue, a single language from which many others evolve. The comparative method can also suggest which branches of a language family developed earlier or later over time.

Historical linguistics uses the language of genetics and family relationships as an analogy to discuss the relationships between languages, so two languages ​​that arose from a single language – say English and German – are referred to as sisters, daughters of a single language mother – in this case the hypothetical Germanic. Languages ​​with common “ancestry” are grouped into families. It is important to note that this is merely an analogy and means nothing about the genetic background of speakers of a language; an English speaker in the modern world is not necessarily a descendant of someone who spoke “Germanic.”

The comparative method generally makes use of a large list of words with the same definitions in the languages ​​being compared. Words that can have native terms in each language are preferable, to avoid the confusion that could arise from borrowed terms. The words are then compared with each other and the correspondences between the sounds are noted. For example, the German f sound corresponds to the Latin p sound at the beginning of a word: the Latin pater (“father”) has the same meaning as the German Vater (pronounced Fah-tuh).

In the comparative method, the linguist records all the correspondences between the languages ​​in question, then sets about writing sound rules to explain the changes. A sound rule for the above example would explain how a single sound in the native language became p in Latin and f in German. The position in a word of a sound match must always be taken into account. For example, Latin p only matches German f at the beginning of a word.

When comparing two or more sister languages ​​and no record of a mother tongue exists, the linguist can use the comparative method to reconstruct a hypothetical mother tongue. One of the best known and most complete of these reconstructed languages ​​is Proto-Indo-European, from which hundreds of European, Middle Eastern, and Central and South Asian languages ​​evolved, including the above examples of Latin and German.

Since the rule of regular sound change states that there are no exceptions to a rule of sound change, anything that appears to be an exception must be studied and explained in a way that satisfies linguistic principles. An apparent anomaly may be due to the effects of another sound-changing rule or the chronological order in which multiple sound changes occurred, or it may appear because the word in question entered the language after the change occurred. sound modification. Having determined the sound change rules for a set of languages ​​under investigation, the next step in the comparative method is to determine the order in which the sound changes occurred. This step is where those things that seemed like exceptions to the postulated rules can come in handy.
As you may have guessed, the comparative method can be a long and complicated process, and sometimes an educated guess is the best conclusion one can come to. However, the comparative method is an indispensable tool for historical linguists and responsible for almost all currently accepted linguistic genealogies.

[ad_2]