The Establishment Clause in the US Constitution prohibits the government from establishing an official religion or favoring one religion over another. It was implemented to end religious harassment by the government. Supreme Court cases, such as Everson v. Board of Education and Lemon v. Kurtzman, have produced tests to determine if a law is attempting to establish religion. The clause has been debated in issues such as school vouchers, prayer in schools, and religious monuments in public places.
The Establishment Clause is the section of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution that reads, “Congress shall make no law concerning the establishment of any religion.” This clause prohibits the federal government from establishing an official religion or from favoring one religion over another. It also prevents the government from favoring religion over non-religion, or vice versa. Every person or group should be safe from religious favoritism under the law, and is more commonly known as the separation of church and state.
Implemented by the Founding Fathers, the Constitution Clause was a unique idea at the time. During that era, it was common for a country to have one official religion, and it was even more common for people of different faiths to be persecuted for their beliefs. Many of those who emigrated to the United States did so for religious freedom. The clause was designed to end religious harassment by a government.
Parts of the Constitution tend to be vague and this amendment is no exception. The first Supreme Court case to deal with it was Everson v. Board of Education in 1947. While grappling with the transportation issue for private religious schools, Judge Hugo LaFayette Black explained what at least the establishment clause meant. He stated that neither a state nor the federal government could establish a church, pass laws to favor a particular religion, compel a person to disclose his religious beliefs, punish any person for his beliefs, apply tax money to religious institutions, or participate in the affairs of religious groups.
The issue of private religious teachers’ salaries was considered in Lemon v. Kurtzman in 1971. Next, he produced the lemon test, which determines whether a law is attempting to establish religion. It was decided that the particular statute must have a secular legislative purpose, the main purpose must not be to promote or inhibit religion, and must not produce an extreme mixing of government and religion.
Similarly, Lynch v. Donnelly in 1984 produced another standard: the approval test. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor said no law or ruling can approve or disapprove of religion. She believed that endorsing a specific religion would make those members think of themselves as especially special, and that disapproving of a specific religion would alienate those members.
The settlement clause has been hotly debated on both sides of the issue. The issues of school vouchers for those attending private religious schools, prayer in schools and public buildings, religious monuments in public places are just some of the issues that have put the clause to the test since the 1940s. It is a topic of debate that seems to have no end.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
