[ad_1]
The false discovery rate (FDR) predicts the number of false positives in data, which can still be useful. It is related to the p-value, but more lenient. Researchers can use calculations to control the FDR and improve study methodology to reduce false positives. Computer programs can assist with FDR calculations.
The false discovery rate (FDR) is a statistical prediction of how many results may be false positives. This allows researchers to analyze the data to determine whether it is statistically significant or worthless. Depending on the type of project, there can be a high tolerance for a high false discovery rate, because the other results are still valid and could be useful. Researchers usually present statistical analyzes of their results and discuss them in the presentation of their work.
This concept is related to the p-value, an estimate of the probability of obtaining a valid and significant result. Small p-values suggest that the data are not that significant, because there is a low statistical probability that they are unique. For example, if someone is drawing colored balls from a bag that contains balls of three colors, that person would expect to draw approximately equal numbers of each color. If 20 balls are drawn and 10 of them are of the same colour, this would be statistically unlikely. To find the p-value, the researcher could perform a statistical analysis to determine the probability of drawing 10 balls of the same color in a 20-ball draw.
In the case of the FDR, there is more leniency than with a p-value. Instead of looking at the statistical likelihood that the results are actually unique, look at the number of false positives that are likely to be found in the results. A large number of false positives could still provide useful data. Researchers will need to be able to identify and rule out false positives from their results, but the remaining information could be very important.
A number of calculations can be used to determine the false discovery rate. If researchers find this rate to be high when they start an experiment, they could make some changes to control it. This could include changes to study methodology, such as getting a larger sample size to reduce the number of false positives. Meticulous study design is very important, because mistakes in this process could create problems with the experiment.
Computer programs are available to assist in counterfeit detection rate calculations. It is also possible to do them by hand. In the course of developing a study methodology, researchers might perform some calculations to identify obvious flaws in the design before the experiment proceeds. This can help them find weaknesses and address them to make the experiment as effective and worthwhile as possible.
[ad_2]