Jurisdiction law determines if a court has the authority to hear a case. Personal and matter-of-fact jurisdiction are required for US courts. Personal jurisdiction is based on benefits received from the government, while matter-of-fact jurisdiction is based on the court’s interest in the matter. The law aims to prevent forum shopping.
Jurisdiction law consists of the law that applies in determining whether or not a court has the authority to hear a particular legal case. For a court to have jurisdiction over a matter within the United States, both personal and matter-of-fact jurisdiction is required. This means that the court must have a vested interest in deciding the matter at hand and must have provided sufficient benefits to the people involved for it to be fair to bring people under the authority of the court.
Personal jurisdiction exists because it is not fair for a court to have authority over someone who has received no benefit from the law enforcement system or court within that community. According to the Jurisdiction Act, personal jurisdiction vests in the court as soon as the person enjoys certain benefits from the state or federal government to which the court belongs. For example, all individuals living in the United States are subject to the personal jurisdiction of federal court because such individuals enjoy living in the United States. A person may also be subject to state court jurisdiction if they have sufficient contact with the state: for example, if they drive into the state and then get into an automobile accident, the state may have jurisdiction over the traffic accident claim because the person drove on their own streets.
According to the Jurisdiction Act, jurisdiction in the matter exists when a court has an interest in deciding the matter. For example, a state court has exclusive jurisdiction when people have a problem determining who owns a particular piece of property, because the state’s interest in deciding how land disputes are resolved is very important. Conversely, the federal court has jurisdiction over cases in which someone questions the constitutionality of a law. It also has jurisdiction over cases where a federal law — such as the Equal Opportunity Employment Act — has been violated or a federal law has been invoked, because the federal government has the best interest in determining how federal laws are interpreted.
The jurisdiction law is also designed to minimize shopping on forums. Forum shopping occurs when there are two courts with concurrent jurisdiction that could each decide a case. The plaintiff and the defendant then have the opportunity to decide which court system they believe will treat their particular case more favorably. The Jurisdiction Act aims to minimize this by limiting the cases that can be transferred to a different court system.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
