The reader-writer problem arises when multiple readers and writers need access to the same resource. Programmers can restrict access to control which processing threads see the resource and when. One solution involves using semaphores to mark state and control access. Programmers have to decide whether readers or writers have priority and how to manage access. The system might assume that writers should be given priority or allow each processing thread access as it arrives to balance the needs of both sides.
The “reader-writer problem” is a programming dilemma created when multiple readers and writers need access to the same resource. If everyone was allowed access at the same time, problems such as overwrites, incomplete information, and other problems could arise. Therefore, programmers can restrict access to control which processing threads see the resource and when, considering the needs of the system and users. There are several ways to approach the reader-writer problem. One of the more common solutions involves using semaphores to mark state and control access.
From one point of view, any number of readers could safely access a resource because they make no changes to the content. Once a writer enters the equation, the situation gets more complicated. If one thread is writing while other threads are reading, readers may not get the correct information. They may only get part of the change, or they may see the outdated information and think it’s accurate.
Even more than one writer could create a problem. Simultaneous changes to the same content could overwrite it and create other errors. Under the reader-writer problem, programmers have to decide whether readers or writers have priority and how to manage access. Readers or writers might be given priority, or the system might assign access on a first-come, first-served basis. This third solution can avoid long waits, but may present problems of its own.
In a solution where readers have priority, the system assumes that any reader requesting access should be allowed in first when access becomes available. This means that authors wishing to access the resource may have to wait. Instead, the system might assume that because writers need to make changes that might affect readers, they should be given priority in the reader-writer problem. When a reader is done with an asset, a writer might step in to make a change. This applies not only to user actions such as trying to save a document, but also to internal computer processes that keep the system running.
Another option allows the reader-writer problem to balance the needs of both sides by allowing each processing thread access as it arrives. This prevents authors from making changes that cancel each other out or confuse readers, without leaving readers waiting or forcing writers to hold off while readers finish. These priorities can be built into a software program or into memory access control in a computer. Users may be able to make changes if they are familiar with programming and the system allows for it.
Protect your devices with Threat Protection by NordVPN
