[ad_1]
The debate between movies and live theater is ongoing. Live theater offers controlled chaos, emotional involvement, and the ability to tailor performances to the audience, while cinema provides a safer medium, technological advantages, and the ability to create immersive worlds. Both have the potential for quality and personal influence. Ultimately, it comes down to personal taste as they are two titans of artistic expression.
A constant debate among fans of both art forms is whether movies are better than live theater. Some consider theatrical productions obsolete and outdated by the technological capabilities of cinema. Others believe that the film too often sells out, engaging in shoddy storylines and writing through excessive special effects and makeup to draw in crowds. However, both forms have the ability to achieve astonishing levels of quality and to influence their audiences on an intensely personal level, albeit with different methods.
Live theater has an air of controlled chaos that is impossible to replicate. Each performance will be slightly different, depending on a variety of factors. Skilled actors are able to gauge the overall mood of their audience and tailor their performance accordingly. However, if audiences are hard to read or find the subject matter offensive, an otherwise excellent production can be dragged through a terrible night.
It is precisely this uncertainty that makes theater attractive to many. Audiences can be drawn in simply by acknowledging that they are not watching a recorded performance but live people. The more emotionally involved the audience becomes, the more the actors can portray the vibe they are getting. Actors often mention the dead silence that can fill a theater during a heightened moment of drama, letting them know that the audience is enraptured by the action.
Cinema, in many ways, is a safer medium. Performances are recorded and a single line or scene can be filmed ten or fifteen times. The work is then further reviewed and selected in the editing process, allowing the editor and director to choose the best versions that complement the entire film. While this removes the element of spontaneity, it can also ensure a well-balanced film free from acting or technical mishaps. If an actor misses a line, he can just start over.
The biggest advantage that cinema has over live theater is technological. Because audiences have less to suspend their disbelief in movies, they can more easily immerse themselves in the world on screen. With surround sound, computer-generated images and carefully selected music tracks, a lusher and more believable world can be created on the screen. Additionally, certain shooting styles and even single film shots can be used to create a more intimate setting and put the audience directly into the action.
Stage limitations can be disastrous, but they can also be liberating. By not needing to focus on fully realized or even fully realistic settings, the director, playwright and cast can better focus on the plot and the characters. Poorly written and acted movies are often excused by great special effects; poorly acted plays almost never receive positive reviews based on production value.
Whether you prefer cinema or live theater is really a matter of personal taste. For any performing arts enthusiast, both genres can offer a wealth of captivating experiences. Individuals may try to tell you that one is demonstrably better than the other, but the truth is, they are two titans of artistic expression, driven and aided by each other.
